But watching the Stanford women's team's games from this year's Stanford Invite I saw the re-emergence of a move that has been building for a few years, and so I feel the need to point it out.
When explaining a vertical stack I will at times refer to the person at the front of that stack as the "Pivot." The idea is that when the disc swings from one third to the other the top of the stack is the rotation point (pivot) of that swing. We all know what a reset is.
The pivot reset is by no means a new idea. I first learned of it over a decade ago from a former Godiva player, who used it over a decade before that as the primary reset style. So let me have a brief history lesson while understanding that despite playing for 20+ years I'm talking about things older than myself and am bound to get something wrong.
There was a time when the concept of having a player behind the disc seemed ridiculous (at least to me). We want to move the disc forward, so that is where the people should be. If a person couldn't get open by 10 (which was longer back then) then we would punt. While my team was stuck punting some teams had figured out how to reset the count from the front of the stack. One of those teams was Lady Godiva.
The idea of Godiva's reset structure was that the first two people in the stack were the resets. If flow couldn't continue those people would run a specific pattern. This involved cutting forward to break your defenders positioning (either by turning their hips or getting them to backpedal) then a 90 turn to either side. The next person would then do the same to the other side. Weaklings would default to the open side, which would still work often. But Godiva players were good at throwing the around so they would use that break often.
This isn't exactly a pivot reset, but lays the groundwork for what happened almost 20 years later. The vertical stack changed drastically in the 90's (Tiina, help me out here and tell me how wrong I am). We moved resets behind the disc because there was more space there and the forward reset died off a bit. Then horizontal offenses became en-vogue and the whole structure of resets changed for a while.
Some college teams, and maybe even some club teams would run a front of the stack reset, but it had moved out of the zeitgeist. As few as 6 years ago I started noticing more New England college teams running it, perhaps as Godiva players started coaching or because defenses became bad at it. There were evolutions to the system, and it didn't much look like what Godiva ran decades before. (This was probably a good choice because what Godiva ran required solid discipline and excellent timing, which are not abundant in the college division).
Instead teams were often running it with a backfield reset as well. The backfield would serve as a primary, and if that wasn't working then they would shift to the front. This made tons of sense and was a logical continuation of a horizontal reset scheme where you look at one side and if that doesn't work you check with the other side that is running counterflow.
Those college players eventually move to club, and club defenses get used to particular offenses, so lo-and-behold we can see club teams using this strategy more and more. But still it was more regulated to the northeast than other schemes. Ironside has been using it more and more over the past few years. It is difficult to defend against, especially with the increase in off-hand throws and creative breaks. The pivot defender has to choose between overplaying the breakside to prevent this reset and allowing the openside pass, or play to the openside and risk being exposed by a (tight-windowed) break. I'll get into defending this later.
But the thing that convinced me that this is coming back was Stanford's use of this system. This is a west coast team utilizing a scheme that is entrenched in northeast history. So apparently someone was paying attention and soon other teams will be as Stanford's women's team looks pretty darn good right now. Despite being understaffed from a roster standpoint, Stanford hung with powerhouse Oregon by using this reset scheme.
In the clip below (sorry for its length) Annee Rempel (#15) is playing the pivot through a series of throwers. When she gets the disc and throws it, she clears back to the front. When the thrower is in trouble she knows to expect a throw to the break side. She even bites on a Stephanie Lim breakmark flick, thinking that it might be for her.
Is this a model for teams that are under-athletic to compete against large schools and their hulking athletes? Not so fast.
First let's analyze the modern iteration of this scheme. The primary reset is still behind, but you have a secondary reset at the front of the stack. When the disc is on the wide side of the field the pivot has the skinny lane as an option (something similar to a pocket pass in basketball). When the thrower looks at the pivot they then get the option of juking to get open. When the disc is trapped this system doesn't work as effectively, but you still can use the pivot to replenish a backfield reset when the original reset cuts downline.
One thing that is particularly difficult about this reset is the possibility of the pivot post. A "post" is basically the same as a post-up entry pass. The pivot is in position and the thrower is just going to put it to a space knowing that the pivot has best line of sight and should be able to get to it first. This post happens often on a backfield reset when the defender is playing straight up. But a pivot post is incredibly difficult to defend without losing position on the pivot. In order to prevent the post you need to be able to see the disc, but you can't see the disc without at least turning 90 degrees on the pivot, which gives them an advantage towards one direction. Due to the short length of the throw, that isn't much time for a defender to recover from that advantage. So to take away the advantage the pivot defender will play straight-up (faceguarding), which opens up the post pass. You can see the issue.
This is why it was working so well for Stanford. Looking at their percentage of unforced errors per possession in the finals against Oregon it was a jaw dropping 29%. Much of that was because Oregon was getting blocks, but it also means that Stanford was only giving away the disc only three out of ten times. By contrast Oregon's %UE was upwards of 43% (mostly on long hucks). Stanford was able to keep possession and in large part it was due to this reset system and excellent handing.
And that is really the key to this scheme, you need to have great handlers. They need to have some good throws to tight spaces (such as Monisha White's use of her lefty backhand) and they need to be able to lead a pass well when needed. Your resets (both front and back) need to be able to stay close without clogging lanes. If your back reset creeps in too much they allow their defender to sag into the throwing lane without being punished. If your pivot reset shifts to the openside too early they alert their defender while also crimping the openside pass.
So I don't think this is a scheme that just any team can work with and expect success. But if you are a team with some incredibly strong handlers with good vision and chemistry (looking at you Texas A&M) this becomes a viable structure that can allow you to hang with more athletic teams while saving your legs for sunday.